democrats.science.house.gov

     

http://democrats.science.house.gov/Media/file/Commdocs/hearings/2009/Oversight/10sep/Taleb_Testimony.pdf

Visit democrats.science.house.gov
Alexa traffic report for DEMOCRATS.SCIENCE.HOUSE.GOV

Tweets about democrats.science.house.gov

  • RT @PauliJllo: I posted this yesterday. Posting it again hoping it gets retweeted. Why isn't the academic community up in arms? @NSF http:/…
  • I posted this yesterday. Posting it again hoping it gets retweeted. Why isn't the academic community up in arms? @NSF
  • RT @Namnezia: This kind of nonsense makes one think twice about agreeing to be an anonymous grant reviewer for fed agencies:
  • "The usual"? #fb RT @Namnezia: This ..makes one think twice about agreeing to be an anonymous grant reviewer for fed
  • RT @Namnezia: .@drugmonkeyblog But do take a look at the original link. Interesting reading: @Dr24hours @surt_lab
  • .@drugmonkeyblog But do take a look at the original link. Interesting reading: @Dr24hours @surt_lab
  • This kind of nonsense makes one think twice about agreeing to be an anonymous grant reviewer for fed agencies:
  • RT @PauliJllo: Letters from and to Chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology committee, who challenged @NSF grant making
  • Letters from and to Chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology committee, who challenged @NSF grant making
  • RT @adamrabinowitz: NSF proposals should now go 1st to Republican caucus for impartial review, esp crap like archaeology, climate change ht…
  • NSF proposals should now go 1st to Republican caucus for impartial review, esp crap like archaeology, climate change
  • In the history of NSF no chairman has ever put themselves forward as an expert in the science that underlies grants:
  • RT @mark_riedl: Letters exchanged between Congress and NSF Chilling.
  • Letters exchanged between Congress and NSF Chilling.
  • @PBremser The actual correspondence is totally fascinating
  • Getting more nervous for Science as I read forward in that last link:
  • A fantastic defense of keeping peer-reviewed science independent of political review by director of NSF. (via @slate)
  • .@RepEBJ praises the “superb peer review system” of #NSF, #NIH & other federal research agencies: #scicomm
  • this letter chain between @LamarSmithTX21 and NSF is actually kind of terrifying if you value scientific integrity
  • RT @theAGU: Rep E. B. Johnson: "Science Cmte Chair threatens confidentiality of NSF review process"
  • Letter from Ranking Member Johnson to Chairman Smith Regarding NSF Grants and the Merit Review Process “your actions…
.