SEARCH
-ID
Psychic analysis of AOL users
and their search logs
Here is search logs of 650,000 AOL users. It's very interesting to view search history of particular person and analyze his personality. Let's do it together! Read more about
AOL search database scandal
or view
research papers on web searching
.
talkorigins.org
Domain:
talkorigins.org
TalkOrigins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy
Found pages about
talkorigins.org
www.
talkorigins
.org
Users that searched for
talkorigins.org
user #
2703188
: profiles.yahoo.com wdunn
Tweets about
talkorigins.org
@MGernonA @nullhypothesis9 @jchojnicki @GregCampNC @DestroTheNoble Look at the link again and scroll down More here
@DJMitchMD
@InsideOurMusic And you're quote mining! Another dishonest tactic.
@Volubrjotr And the verified predictions for ToE can be found here:
@Volubrjotr In case you missed it previously:
@Volubrjotr Examples here:
@Volubrjotr No. Mutations can results in increase info
@Volubrjotr Adding information is most certainly possible
@Volubrjotr Are you now claiming mutations cannot add information?
Spontaneous Generation and the Origin of Life
@Volubrjotr And evidence from different branches of biology such as these:
@Volubrjotr Experiments such as these:
@Volubrjotr True.
#jw.org
@EVACERDA4804E @FakeAmos43 @MYirrell Here's speciation in action. https://t.co/7OP34SeWYI
RT @SkiPoss: @EDebunked WRONG! Do your research properly...
@MYirrell this may help. @StuartHelmer
@Volubrjotr here I did some for you. You're welcome @TheoryFail
.@Volubrjotr Observed change in species: You're welcome.
@OktarBabuna @AndresDelRisco & here's the link I gave u a day ago that deals with Darwin. Clearly u haven't read it.
Arguing with a creationist? Here's help....
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution #atheism
@EDebunked Well you might want to SIT for this one. EDUCATE YOURSELF... especially 2nd last bit
Are Mutations Harmful? -
@EDebunked WRONG! Do your research properly...
@TheAdamConners @rmbctious @TakeThatDarwin @CrookedBeggar
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Evolution, and Probability:
Observed Instances of Speciation:
Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale - Circular Reasoning or Reliable Tools?
.@EDebunked Observed change in species: You're welcome.
@EmilyMayRocks Nope.
cool folklore-->
@jabaristeward Here you go:
@jabaristeward @zibeeb
@JahMMARastafari Evidence for common descent:
RT @TheoryFail: .@senorcastro @grenangle @idebunkforme Observed change in species: You're welcome.
.@senorcastro @grenangle @idebunkforme Observed change in species: You're welcome.
@TonySantana321 reptiles to birds here: @DuncanWeston @joe_rocket65 @jackiebarbosa @dracdrum
@TonySantana321 @DuncanWeston @joe_rocket65 @jackiebarbosa @dracdrum
@TonySantana321 speciation observed MANY TIMES: @DuncanWeston @joe_rocket65 @jackiebarbosa @dracdrum
@TheSunriseMusic @DeJaReMeKS Not without proof:
@OktarBabuna Better read the whole chapter. Trying to prove Darwin didn't believe in ToE is a little silly. No?
@Anchored90 Yep. Here are some observed evolution if you're interested:
RT @BlackWolfTwo: .@timsturm3 @AtyHans @BreakingGodless this is informative.
@chessboxer35 Can you come up with an argument that has not been thoroughly debunked? Here's a good place to start.
.@lphanlon84 @AtyHans @muscleophagus @ne_henry @Stooshie Observed change in species: You're welcome.
@TomBeltz where did i send you a wiki link? haha i gave you 2 university sites, indiana university and berkeley and
@TomBeltz
.@QuantumGreg You sure about that?
@HomunculusLoikm This is a big link, but a good start for everyone.
Back to all keywords
. ,